In an effort to focus my time and effort I have moved all articles posted here to http://www.johnkdavis.com. I will not be renewing the domain registration for this blog--it will come due in a few months--so this blog will disappear then.
New articles will continue to be posted, but at the new URL. You can easily find them by clicking on Transhumanism in the left column category list at www.johnkdavis.com.
This is interesting. Microsoft has a patent on a new kind of network: Your body.
The software giant has received a U.S. patent for a "method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body." An application for the patent, No. 6,754, 472, was filed in 2000 and awarded this week.Microsoft proposes linking portable devices such as watches and other wearable devices, keyboards, displays, and speakers using the conductivity of "a body of a living creature."
This article is interesting: Strange food for thought. Here is a short excerpt:
"We're about to be handed a bunch of powerful new capabilities ... to refashion ourselves, improve ourselves," notes Martha Farah, a director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania, in an e-mail. "We should always think through the ethical consequences of changing ourselves and our lives, for the individual and for society."
A story in Wired this morning caught my eye. It seems a famous clothes designer has perfected a system that will easily port to computerized design and 3-D printing.
Normally, clothes are made by weaving thread or yarn into fabric, which is then snipped and stitched to create, say, a dress. The A-POC method requires no sewing. Thread goes into the loom, the dress comes out. Specifically, a flattened tube of material emerges that contains the finished shirt, skirt, or pants, which need only to be cut out along the faint outline already woven or knit into the fabric. Moreover, the material can be snipped anywhere without unraveling, a feature that allows for complete customization. A pair of scissors and a flirtatious spirit can turn a turtleneck into a plunging V-neck.
But the reporter also points out how the same technology could easily be used for many other products.
Any material that can be turned into a fiber can work in the A-POC process, which gives Miyake the opportunity to produce anything from shoes to portable shelters. The A-POC team already has developed a series of colorful beanbag-like chairs and sofas that will come to market this year. The studio is also interested in a new corn-based fiber that could be used to construct other types of furniture, and it recently developed a resin-linen blend that a University of Tokyo lab found to be as strong as steel.
A revolution is moving the world quickly toward molecular manufacturing and an economy turned upside down. What will it mean when anyone can have any material object for free? Food, clothes, transportation, spacecraft; any object made of molecules essentially free of cost, free of human labor, free to be created by anyone with a clever idea?
The Institute for Accelerating Change (AIC) has been sponsoring a Futurist Salon in Los Angeles for awhile, not unlike the Futurist Salon here in San Diego. The LA group is developing a Futurist Dinner Series as a funding and networking opportunity for the IAC. The dinners will have one distinguished futurist sharing an intimate dinner with 10-20 interested guests. The speaker will give a short speech at the beginning of the evening and spend the rest of his or her time talking candidly with guests.
Jessica Richman, the leader of the San Diego Futurist Salon, and I have been in communication and we want to create a similar Futurist Dinner Series here in San Diego. The key to its success will be finding distinguished futurists who will join us for an evening of conversation. If you know of potential candidates in the San Diego area, please email me their contact information and a little information about their expertise or talent and we will see if a San Diego Futurist Dinner Series can be a happening thing.
I am a fan of Larry Lessig's blog, but it is his recent short opinion piece in Wired that moved me to tears. It is unlikely to move you to the same degree, but his message is one that I have become evermore convinced is the essential missing priority that will be required if we are to survive the next few decades. It is my deepest prayer that humanity will embrace this way of thinking as soon as possible.
This is the core message:
If we can't defend against an attack, perhaps the rational response is to reduce the incentives to attack. Rather than designing space suits, maybe we should focus on ways to eliminate the reasons to annihilate us. Rather than stirring up a hornet's nest and then hiding behind a bush, maybe the solution is to avoid the causes of rage. Crazies, of course, can't be reasoned with. But we can reduce the incentives to become a crazy. We could reduce the reasonableness - from a certain perspective - for finding ways to destroy us.
And later, Larry warns: "Our present course of unilateral cowboyism will continue to produce generations of angry souls seeking revenge on us."
Amen.
In an open letter at the Foresight Institute's website, K. Eric Drexler explains why you should care about molecular nanotechnology. He concludes, in part, with this:
Remarkably, in the U.S. today, the senior national leadership in nanoscale science and technology is in denial about the future of the field. Research is accordingly misdirected, and discussion of legitimate concerns has been distorted by official disinformation and politically motivated attacks.
Yahoo! News quotes Bill Gates:
"Ten years out, in terms of actual hardware costs you can almost think of hardware as being free -- I'm not saying it will be absolutely free -- but in terms of the power of the servers, the power of the network will not be a limiting factor,"
Gates said this in reference to networked computers and advances in the speed of the Internet.
Nanotechnology will soon not only make any material object easily available with little or no human labor, but it will also provide the object at little or no cost. We need to be thinking about this new economy and preparing for the disruptions it will create.
A recent news article highlights statements from scientists who are on the verge of creating life--a not-so-subtle twist in the nanotechnology field.
More than 3.5 billion years after nature transformed non-living matter into living things, populating Earth with a cornucopia of animals and plants, scientists say they are finally ready to try their hand at creating life. If they succeed, humanity will enter a new age of "living technology," where harnessing the power of life to spontaneously adapt to complex situations could solve problems that now defy modern engineering.
A news release from Duke University Medical Center describes the results of the first human studies of the feasibility of using brain signals to operate external devices. The research team is now working to develop prototype devices to enable paralyzed people to operate "neuroprosthetic" and other external devices using only their brain signals. The full results will be published in the July 2004 issue of the journal Neurosurgery.
The research builds on earlier studies in the Nicolelis laboratory, in which monkeys learned to control a robot arm using only their brain signals (Monkey Brains).
Recent Comments